@FREE E-PUB å Race, Rock, and Elvis Û eBook or E-pub free

@FREE E-PUB Ç Race, Rock, and Elvis ⚣ In Race, Rock, and Elvis, Michael T Bertrand contends that popular music, specifically Elvis s brand of rock n roll, helped revise racial attitudes after World War II Observing that youthful fans of rhythm and blues, rock n roll, and other black inspired music seemed inclined than their segregationist elders to ignore the color line, Bertrand links popular music with a general relaxation, led by white youths, of the historical denigration of blacks in the South The tradition of southern racism, successfully communicated to previous generations, failed for the first time when confronted with the demand for rock n roll by a new, national, commercialized youth culture In a narrative peppered with the colorful observations of ordinary southerners, Bertrand argues that appreciating black music made possible a new recognition of blacks as fellow human beings Bertrand documents black enthusiasm for Elvis and cites the racially mixed audiences that flocked to the new music at a time when adults expected separate performances for black and white audiences He describes the critical role of radio and recordings in blurring the color line and notes that these media made black culture available to appreciative whites on an unprecedented scale He also shows how music was used to define and express the values of a southern working class youth culture in transition, as young whites, many of them trying to orient themselves in an unfamiliar urban setting, embraced black music and culture as a means of identifying themselves By adding rock n roll to the mix of factors that fed into civil rights advances in the South, Race, Rock, and Elvis shows how the music, with its rituals and vehicles, symbolized the vast potential for racial accord inherent in postwar society The sensational title is a little misleading The book isabout class and the economic factors surrounding the emergence of rock n roll That said, the analysis is interesting It reads like a PhD thesis repetitive and dryer than it needs to be The author is a historian thankfully, he does not write in the high academese that is common to some other disciplines.