#DOWNLOAD PDF ⚡ Writing into the Dark: How to Write a Novel without an Outline á eBook or E-pub free

This is a great book for us pantsers It s okay to not outline, to edit as you write, and write out of sequence I smiled as I read this book and it validated my process There s a method to the madness. I think this is a terrible book I don t like judging books as goods , but 5 for a book that I read in like 2 hours is frankly outrageous I kept reading it hoping to find the Ha That s the catch moment and when I got to 80% on my Kindle the book finished and the rest 20% is basically advertising for another book of the author.Apart from that, this is one of those books with a couple of ideas that you can express in three pages, but the author writes and rewrites and rephrases them over an I think this is a terrible book I don t like judging books as goods , but 5 for a book that I read in like 2 hours is frankly outrageous I kept reading it hoping to find the Ha That s the catch moment and when I got to 80% on my Kindle the book finished and the rest 20% is basically advertising for another book of the author.Apart from that, this is one of those books with a couple of ideas that you can express in three pages, but the author writes and rewrites and rephrases them over and over again for 75 pages.I ve read multiple books about outlining a novel Outlining is not the silver bullet to write a novel nor a method for all, but at least all the books about novel planning i read DO give you a method often step by step you can apply and explain why it might be a good idea to try it for your next novel.In Writing Into The Dark the author uses an irritating I know it all tone and I swear because I m fun and easygoing that gets old and boring pretty soon.Basically the book is There is a mythical creative voice that is GOOD and a mythical critical voice that is BAD Stuck on your writing Blame the critical voice Want to write Trust the creative voice and if you re stuck or write crap go back a little and follow your creative voiceYou don t know what to write Just write What Creative voice tells you Because it is GOOD Critical voice BAD.That s it, really I just saved you 5 bucks because this is all the author writes over and over in different forms for the whole short and overpriced book.How to shape characters and get to know them while writing by the seat of your pants How to get a sense of the inner story structure What if I missed some important parts chapters ago How to develop and explore settings Who knows, the author doesn t bother to say anything about actually coming up with a story and develop it If you pick up any book that talks about outlining novels they really take you by the hand into shaping a story I m not saying that outlining is inherently better than writing into the dark But really, if you pick up any book about writing, I may assume you re not Stephen King, you re and aspiring writer with little or no experience and frankly some generic hippy follow your path, trust your soul while writing kind of crap is useless #DOWNLOAD PDF Ö Writing into the Dark: How to Write a Novel without an Outline â With than a hundred published novels and than seventeen million copies of his books in print, USA Today bestselling author Dean Wesley Smith knows how to outline And he knows how to write a novel without an outline In this WMG Writer s Guide, Dean takes you step by step through the process of writing without an outline and explains why not having an outline boosts your creative voice and keeps you interested in your writing Want to enjoy your writing and entertain yourself Then toss away your outline and Write into the Dark Hey, this is how I writeIt s actually nice to get affirmation that you re doing it right What I ve always called Looping, Dean calls Cycling, but they re both basically the same process I ve tried multiple times to outline large complicated novels only to find I can t complete them Same goes for short stories The moment I plan too much, the playful part of my brain gets bored and wants to give up on the work It s nice to see a process explained that takes advantage of the playful part of Hey, this is how I writeIt s actually nice to get affirmation that you re doing it right What I ve always called Looping, Dean calls Cycling, but they re both basically the same process I ve tried multiple times to outline large complicated novels only to find I can t complete them Same goes for short stories The moment I plan too much, the playful part of my brain gets bored and wants to give up on the work It s nice to see a process explained that takes advantage of the playful part of the brain, channels that playfulness into useful sets of tools, and then gives you permission to write in a way that doesn t feel dreadful.Understand, this isn t a long book with some complicated process, but it s worth every penny for the freedom it gives.I tell myself to always trust the process Knowing someone as prolific as Dean faces the same process challenges and has learned to embrace them as features and not see them as roadblocks really gives me the encouragement to keep doing what I m doing detailed outlines and 11 redrafts are out the door.Now I m going to go have some fun and write a new story Maybe one of the reasons I liked this book so much is that it confirmed the writing style I gravitate towards naturally, especially the discussion of cycling as a way to edit while you go and build up momentum. A few good ideas, nothing bad It s reallylike a few long blog posts than a book though The biggest problem with this book, as with a lot of Smith s otherwise excellent writing advice, is that he uses nonstandard terminology You have to read carefully to understand what he s really saying For example, he recommends no rewriting and revising However if you read between the lines he describes his own rewriting and revision process What he s really recommending is rewriting and revising A few good ideas, nothing bad It s reallylike a few long blog posts than a book though The biggest problem with this book, as with a lot of Smith s otherwise excellent writing advice, is that he uses nonstandard terminology You have to read carefully to understand what he s really saying For example, he recommends no rewriting and revising However if you read between the lines he describes his own rewriting and revision process What he s really recommending is rewriting and revising as you go rather than in a second pass after the first draft is written I suspect Smith has one really good book about writing inside him, and pieces of it keep dribbling out here and there It would be nice to see one larger unified book from him that puts it all together Not just a larger collection of blog posts either In fact dare I say it a planned and outlined book There s a lot here that dips into ideas he s talked and written about at greater length elsewhere e.g critical voice vs creative voice and some of that may seem unsupported or unclear if you haven t read that as well.That s not to disagree with his advice here for novels, but for how to nonfiction not discussed in this book but what this book itself is it can be useful for an author to have a clear picture of what topics they need to cover and which ones depend on and follow which others Smith has a fairly well developed approach to writing, but it s not yet available anywhere in a unified form If you re a newbie writer, be careful with this one The author gives a lot of advice on his process, but he delivers it as though it s a must, despite saying there s no wrong way He had some interesting things to say about discovery seat of the pants writing, though what I don t like is that he tells you to revise as you go, but that s just not possible for a lot of writers, myself include I hate doing it since it bogs me way down and I lose momentum Also, I enjoy rewriting.This may be overl If you re a newbie writer, be careful with this one The author gives a lot of advice on his process, but he delivers it as though it s a must, despite saying there s no wrong way He had some interesting things to say about discovery seat of the pants writing, though what I don t like is that he tells you to revise as you go, but that s just not possible for a lot of writers, myself include I hate doing it since it bogs me way down and I lose momentum Also, I enjoy rewriting.This may be overly critical, seeing as how I m no even a published author and this guy s got over a hundred published works and has been on bestseller lists and all that, but I noticed a lot and I mean a LOT of his books tend to range under 4 stars in the ratings department I ve read plenty of good books that were rated under 4 stars, but I ve read a whole lotthat just seemed to be missing something It s not fair of me to say that seems like a mark against the author s style of writing, but there it is.Edit 2019 I don t know what it is, but I m gravitatingandtoward this way of doing things I ve read this book like five times For some reason I find it highly inspirational I must have been deluding myself about rewriting, but I can t stand it any This could be due to the fact that I have a strong understanding of story structure and so I have no real need to outline My want to outline comes out of a want to be structured from fear of failure I ve written into the dark, or nearly into the dark, and my writing is much better I can see the difference that Smith talks about in his book I still think it s important to have a strong grasp of craft and structure, and I do some minor revisions to fill in broken things regarding my stories, but I m pretty good at filling in the gaps without rewriting I only picked this up because Dean Wesley Smith s wife, Kristine Kathryn Rusch, is one of the smartest cookies around I ve found her advice to aspiring writers to be thoughtful and well reasoned I m afraid Writing into the Dark did nothing for me, and at 5.99, it felt like a ripoff, for what is essentially a long blog post plus a pitch to purchase another book While this might be helpful to beginner writers who are struggling to birth that first novel, virtually nothing is useful to as I only picked this up because Dean Wesley Smith s wife, Kristine Kathryn Rusch, is one of the smartest cookies around I ve found her advice to aspiring writers to be thoughtful and well reasoned I m afraid Writing into the Dark did nothing for me, and at 5.99, it felt like a ripoff, for what is essentially a long blog post plus a pitch to purchase another book While this might be helpful to beginner writers who are struggling to birth that first novel, virtually nothing is useful to aseasoned author Smith s conviction that the critical voice drowns out the creative voice, thus leaving the writer paralyzed and or with a bland story seems reductive and ill reasoned Writing well requires the careful employment of the critical voice to ensure that one is being as creative as possible Mostly, this book seems ignorant about the actual craft of writing and there is an actual craft, replete with mandates on everything from how to render dialogue tags to using deep point of view Storytelling may be innate, but story writing does require technical knowledge.Wesley has written over 150 books, so it s possible that his instincts are honed well enough to not care about craft However, for most of us, even when dogged with the terror and uncertainty present in writing fiction, we can all benefit from writingthan one draft another pet piece of advice to ensure that the book is, in fact, readable and cogent from soup to nuts This is a short manual for beginning writers, written by a pulp fiction writer and former poker game professional The least I can say is that it goes against what many other writing manuals profess as an ultimate truth, namely that fiction writing must be planned in advance, that outlining the plot is essential and so forth there are all sorts of methods out there on that topic, especially focusing on screenwriting techniques.Dean Wesley Smith takes the opposite view, the panster view, as This is a short manual for beginning writers, written by a pulp fiction writer and former poker game professional The least I can say is that it goes against what many other writing manuals profess as an ultimate truth, namely that fiction writing must be planned in advance, that outlining the plot is essential and so forth there are all sorts of methods out there on that topic, especially focusing on screenwriting techniques.Dean Wesley Smith takes the opposite view, the panster view, as it is often called His key idea is that outlining a story beforehand is a way to give the critical voice , the learned, formulaic, derivative voice the upper hand, and thus screw the creative voice that writes from the unconscious this assumption is barely explained, though, if at all The author goes even further, advising against any rewriting, once the first draft is done This means, in a nutshell, that writing a novel should or could be done without safety nets, since using them is nothing but a way to ward off fear, an expression of resistance and a way to sabotage oneself on the part of the writer The book ends with a couple of interesting hints on writer s block , on looping and cycling around the draft, on outlining a posteriori instead of a priori , and on accepting to write extra words while experimenting.All this should probably be taken with a pinch of salt, but by and large, his argument certainly is liberating, since it encourages writers to embrace uncertainty, to trust their guts first, in short to write from the inside, instead of adopting any of the formulas that are hard sold everywhere I ve actually read this short book on the art of writing a novel without relying on outlines or other machinations three times now That, as much as anything, tells me it s a book I value and that the advice inside unlike that of so many fiction guides is bothvaluable and warrants returning to now and again.One advantage Smith has over so many other would be writing gurus is that he can actually back up his claims through his own work over two hundred novels published over a hundred I ve actually read this short book on the art of writing a novel without relying on outlines or other machinations three times now That, as much as anything, tells me it s a book I value and that the advice inside unlike that of so many fiction guides is bothvaluable and warrants returning to now and again.One advantage Smith has over so many other would be writing gurus is that he can actually back up his claims through his own work over two hundred novels published over a hundred of those through traditional publishers , and six or seven hundred short stories So much of the time when I find a book on outlining I look up the author s work, read the first page and find myself doubting the virtue of their advice Butthan that, Dean Wesley Smith offers some concrete ways to begin, push through the middle, and end novels without outlines, which is a great dealhelpful than the usual just listen to your muse form of pantsing one hears about it s worth noting that the term pantser , not not explicitly pejorative, seems exclusively used by people selling books on the importance plotting I can t say whether Smith s approach is definitively better than others After all, there s no one correct way to write a book I say that having had ten novels published, none of which followed the exact same process However here s what I can say with confidence the most important quality any book on writing should have is to make you want to put it down at the end and go write Every time I ve sat down with Dean Wesley Smith s Writing Into The Dark, It s gotten me to run off and start writing myself That s five star writing advice as far as I m concerned